PageKit — the self-hosted GrapesJS site builder, sold as source. Get early access

Editor comparison

GrapesJS vs TinyMCE: Which Editor Is Right for Your Product?

Compare GrapesJS and TinyMCE for rich-text editing, visual page building, HTML/CSS control, extensibility, CMS integrations and SaaS applications.TinyMCE focuses on rich-text content editing. GrapesJS focuses on visual page and layout editing.

Two layers, not two rivalsVerified against both projectsNo scores, no winner column
What are you editing?
Content editor

TinyMCE

Owns what happens inside a block of text: formatting, structure, media, and the writing experience around them.

  • Rich text
  • Articles
  • CMS content
  • Documentation
Visual editor

GrapesJS

Owns the page itself: the component tree, the layout, the styles, the breakpoints and the reusable pieces.

  • Pages
  • Layouts
  • Components
  • Styles
  • Templates
Start here

GrapesJS vs TinyMCE: The Short Answer

Both are mature, well-maintained JavaScript editors, and both are widely used in production. They are not the same kind of tool, so the useful question is not which is better — it is which layer of your product needs an editor.

TinyMCE — the best starting point for rich-text and content editing

  • Articles and long-form writing
  • Blogs and editorial workflows
  • CMS content fields
  • Documentation and knowledge bases
  • Rich-text fields inside forms
  • Formatted content with tables and lists
  • Content authoring as the main job
  • Advanced text workflows and review
TinyMCE documentation

GrapesJS — the best starting point for visual page editing

  • Landing pages and marketing pages
  • Website and page builders
  • Drag-and-drop layout editing
  • Visual templates your users reuse
  • HTML and CSS edited visually
  • Reusable, nestable components
  • Responsive editing across breakpoints
  • SaaS page builders and embedded editors
  • White-label visual editors
See how GrapesJS + TinyMCE works

Need both? Use GrapesJS for visual page composition and TinyMCE for advanced rich-text editing — TinyMCE can be integrated into GrapesJS as the rich-text editing layer.

The fundamental difference

TinyMCE and GrapesJS Solve Different Problems

The clearest way to tell them apart is to ask what object the user has selected when they start editing.

TinyMCE: the main object is the content

TinyMCE is centred on rich-text and content authoring. A user opens a field, writes, formats, inserts an image or a table, and saves. The document is a flow of content, and the editor's job is to make writing and formatting that content feel effortless.

GrapesJS: the main object is the page

GrapesJS is centred on visual page composition. A user drags a section onto a canvas, nests components inside it, restyles them, checks a mobile breakpoint and saves a project. The document is a component tree, and the editor's job is to make composing and styling that tree feel direct.

TinyMCE — a document
  • Article
  • Heading
  • Paragraph
  • Image
  • List
  • Quote

A flow of content. Order matters; nesting mostly does not.

GrapesJS — a page
  • Page
  • Header
  • Hero
  • Heading
  • Text
  • Button
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Footer

A composition. Nesting is the structure, and it goes as deep as the design needs.

TinyMCE edits the content. GrapesJS edits the page.

The question that decides it

What Are Your Users Actually Editing?

Answer this one honestly and the rest of the page is mostly confirmation.

Write and format this content.

Your users open a field, a post or a document and produce text. Layout is fixed by your templates; what varies is what the words say and how they are formatted.

Reach for

TinyMCE

Build and customize this page.

Your users assemble the page itself — sections, columns, spacing, colours, breakpoints — and expect to see the result as they work.

Reach for

GrapesJS

Build this page and edit the content inside it.

Your users compose the layout and then write inside it, and neither half can feel like an afterthought. This is the case the combination exists for.

Reach for

GrapesJS + TinyMCE

Architecture

GrapesJS vs TinyMCE Architecture

Both are libraries you integrate into an application you already own. Neither dictates your backend, your auth, your permissions or your hosting — the difference is which band of the stack each one occupies.

Content pipeline

TinyMCE in an application

  1. Your applicationYours
  2. TinyMCEEditor
  3. Rich contentHandoff
  4. Database or CMSYours
  5. FrontendYours

TinyMCE owns the editing surface. What you store, where you store it and how you render it are your application's decisions on this side.

Visual pipeline

GrapesJS in an application

  1. Your applicationYours
  2. GrapesJSEditor
  3. Visual editorEditor

    Core modules

    • Components
    • Blocks
    • Styles
    • Assets
    • Commands
  4. Project dataHandoff
  5. HTML / CSS, publishingYours

GrapesJS owns the editing surface and the canvas modules behind it. Storage, publishing and hosting are still your application's decisions on this side too.

Both can be integrated into existing applications, but their primary responsibilities are different. Neither product decides your architecture below the handoff line.

Capability by capability

GrapesJS vs TinyMCE: Feature Comparison

No scores and no winner column. Each cell names the mechanism, so you can disagree with a row and still use the table.

CapabilityTinyMCEGrapesJS
The content layer
Rich-text editingPrimary focusBuilt in
Text formattingBuilt inBuilt in
HeadingsBuilt inBuilt in
ListsBuilt inExtension
TablesBuilt inExtension
LinksBuilt inBuilt in
Images and mediaBuilt inBuilt in
Content authoringPrimary focusNot the focus
Advanced rich-text workflowsExtensionCustom
CommentsExtensionCustom
MentionsExtensionCustom
Real-time collaborationExtensionCustom
The page layer
Visual canvasNot the focusPrimary focus
Drag-and-drop layoutNot the focusBuilt in
Page compositionCustomPrimary focus
HTML/CSS visual editingCustomBuilt in
Responsive visual editingCustomBuilt in
Reusable piecesExtensionBuilt in
Component nestingNot the focusBuilt in
Style ManagerCustomBuilt in
Asset managementIntegrationBuilt in
Multi-page projectsCustomBuilt in
Product shapes
Project storageYour appBuilt in
Publishing workflowYour appIntegration
SaaS page builderCustomStrong fit
Embeddable editorStrong fitStrong fit
White-label visual editorCustomStrong fit
Platform
CMS integrationIntegrationIntegration
TypeScript typesBuilt inBuilt in
ExtensibilityBuilt inBuilt in
Self-hostingBuilt inBuilt in

How to read the cells

Primary focus
This is what the product is built around.
Built in
Ships in the box, no add-on needed.
Extension
Covered by an official add-on or a marketplace plugin.
Custom
Possible, but you build it on top.
Your app
The surrounding application owns this on both sides.
Integration
Depends on what you wire the editor to.
Strong fit
A shape the product is commonly used for.
Not the focus
Technically reachable, but not what the product is designed around.

Packages and licences

Read from the npm registry and the shipped bundles on 2026-09-03.

PackageVersionLicenceTypes
tinymce8.9.0GPL-2.0-or-later or commercialtinymce.d.ts
grapesjs0.23.6BSD-3-Clausedist/index.d.ts

TinyMCE's package points at its own licence file, which offers the GNU GPL or Tiny's commercial terms. Self-hosted TinyMCE asks you to declare which one you are using in the editor config. Under the open-source terms you pass license_key: 'gpl' in the editor config to accept them.

Being honest

When TinyMCE Is the Better Choice

If most of these describe your product, TinyMCE is the right tool and adding a page builder will not make it better.

  • Your users primarily write content
  • Rich-text editing is the core workflow, not a supporting one
  • The product is article-oriented
  • The product is CMS-oriented and layout comes from templates
  • Users need advanced text formatting
  • Content authoring matters more than page layout
  • Collaboration and review features are important
  • Document and content workflows are central

A landing page that sells you the wrong tool is worth less than one that tells you when to stop reading. If the list above is your product, TinyMCE is a strong, well-supported answer.

TinyMCE documentation
The other side

When GrapesJS Is the Better Choice

If most of these describe your product, the layout problem is the one you actually have.

  • Your users build complete pages
  • Layout is part of what they are editing
  • Drag-and-drop composition is required
  • Users need to style things visually
  • Components must be reusable across pages
  • Responsive editing is required
  • Users need visual templates to start from
  • The application is a SaaS page builder
  • The editor needs to be embedded in your product
  • The editor needs to be white-labelled
  • Developers need control over the editor's architecture
Try the live editor
The third option

You Don't Have to Choose: GrapesJS + TinyMCE

GrapesJS and TinyMCE can complement each other instead of competing for the same role. GrapesJS owns the page; TinyMCE takes over the moment a user starts editing text inside one of its components.

Your product

GrapesJS

Visual page editing

Canvas, components, blocks, styles, breakpoints, assets and project data.

TinyMCE

Rich text editing

Formatting, lists, tables, links and the writing experience inside a component.

Your backend
What happens when a user edits
  1. User opens a page
  2. GrapesJS provides the visual canvas
  3. User selects a text component
  4. TinyMCE provides rich-text editing
  5. GrapesJS preserves the page structure
  6. Your application stores the project data
  7. Your application publishes the page

Use GrapesJS for the page. Use TinyMCE for the text.

This is a real configuration, not a diagram: GrapesJS exposes its rich-text layer as a replaceable module, and an integration swaps TinyMCE in behind it. It is also more moving parts than running one editor — two libraries, two upgrade paths, and TinyMCE's own licensing to pick. Worth it when your users genuinely do both jobs; not worth it when they only do one.

Ready-made integration

Add TinyMCE 8 to Your GrapesJS Editor

Professional rich-text editing, directly inside the GrapesJS canvas.

TinyMCE 8 × GrapesJS

Professional rich-text editing inside your visual page builder

Don't build the TinyMCE integration from scratch. This plugin replaces the built-in GrapesJS rich-text editor with TinyMCE 8, with separate toolbars for block and inline elements and a toolbar that behaves correctly inside a canvas iframe.

Key features

  • Full toolbar on block elements — formatting, indentation, alignment, lists, links
  • Compact toolbar on inline elements, where Enter inserts a line break instead of breaking out
  • Toolbar renders in the parent document, so it clears Studio's selection overlay and badges
  • TypeScript throughout, with exported type definitions
  • Clean teardown: listeners, observers and toolbar DOM released on disable and destroy
  • Pass through any native TinyMCE init option; Tiny Cloud or self-hosted

Options you'll actually use

  • inline_toolbar
  • parentToolbar: true
  • license_key
  • destroy()
GrapesJS
>= 0.21, < 1.0
TinyMCE
8.x
Bundles
ESM + UMD + TypeScript types
The TinyMCE 8 toolbar open on a text element inside a GrapesJS canvas

TinyMCE 8 Inline Text Editor

by DevFuture Development

$69one-time

What's included

  • Source code package (project files)
  • Production-ready dist build
  • GrapesJS Studio compatible
  • Commercial license
  • Future updates included

TinyMCE itself is licensed separately by Tiny under the GNU GPL or their commercial terms — this plugin is the GrapesJS integration, not a TinyMCE licence.

Live editor

Try GrapesJS With Rich-Text Editing

This is a real GrapesJS instance running in this page. Drag a block in, click an element to style it, then double-click any text and edit it — the panel under the canvas tells you exactly which rich-text layer you are using.

CMS products

TinyMCE vs GrapesJS for CMS Products

Most CMSs need both layers eventually. Which one you build first depends on what your editors complain about.

Content-first CMS

  1. CMS
  2. TinyMCE
  3. Rich content
  4. Frontend
Best for articles, blog posts, documentation, text-heavy content and structured authoring. Layout comes from your templates.

Visual CMS

  1. CMS / backend
  2. GrapesJS
  3. Visual page
  4. Project data
  5. Publishing
Best for landing pages, marketing pages, visual page editing and website composition. Layout is part of what the editor produces.
Building a visual editing layer on a headless CMS
SaaS products

TinyMCE vs GrapesJS for SaaS Products

What exactly are your customers editing?

For a SaaS product the question is not what your team prefers — it is what your customers will be looking at when they open the editor.

  1. Customers edit content
  2. TinyMCE
Content SaaS — the editor is a field in your product.
  1. Customers build pages
  2. GrapesJS
Page-builder SaaS — the editor is the product.
  1. Customers build pages containing rich text
  2. GrapesJS + TinyMCE
Visual content builder — the editor is the product, and people write inside it.
Straight answer

Can TinyMCE Replace GrapesJS?

TinyMCE can be highly customized, but it is not primarily designed as a complete visual page-building framework.

It is not that TinyMCE cannot be extended — its plugin API is thorough and people have built remarkable things on it. It is that the things a page builder needs are not the things a rich-text editor supplies, so you would be building them.

What the user is editing

In TinyMCE
  • "Welcome to our website"
In GrapesJS
  • Header
  • Hero
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Footer

What a page builder needs on top

  • A visual canvas
  • A component model
  • Layout tools
  • Visual styling
  • Reusable blocks
  • Responsive editing
  • Asset management
  • Page and project structure

If you only need one or two of those, extending TinyMCE may well be the smaller job. If you need most of them, you are writing a page builder — and that is what GrapesJS already is.

Straight answer

Can GrapesJS Replace TinyMCE?

Sometimes.

GrapesJS ships its own rich-text editor. Its default toolbar has six actions, measured on 2026-09-03 in version 0.23.6, and for headlines, buttons, captions and short marketing copy that is genuinely enough — which is why most GrapesJS page builders never add anything.

GrapesJS default RTE actions

  • bold
  • italic
  • underline
  • strikethrough
  • link
  • wrap

For applications that need a more advanced or specialised rich-text experience — long-form content, tables, lists, structured formatting, review workflows — TinyMCE can be integrated as the rich-text layer instead, without giving up the visual canvas.

Add TinyMCE to GrapesJS
Data models

What Data Does Each Editor Work With?

This is the section that decides how hard a migration is, so it is worth two minutes.

TinyMCE: a content document

editor.getContent()

What it contains

  • headings
  • paragraphs
  • links
  • lists
  • media
content.htmlHTML
<h2>Build faster</h2>
<p>Editable <strong>copy</strong> with a <a href="/pricing">link</a>.</p>
<ul><li>One</li><li>Two</li></ul>

A markup string. Your application decides where it lives and how it is rendered — TinyMCE returns the content and stops there.

GrapesJS: a project document

editor.getProjectData()

What it contains

  • pages
  • components
  • styles
  • assets
  • config
project.jsonJSON
{
  "pages": [
    {
      "id": "SjtXdsYjpE8EJUpL",
      "frames": [
        {
          "component": {
            "type": "wrapper",
            "components": [
              { "tagName": "section", "classes": ["hero"], "components": [
                { "tagName": "h2", "type": "text", "components": [
                  { "type": "textnode", "content": "Build faster" }
                ]},
                { "type": "link", "classes": ["btn"],
                  "attributes": { "href": "#" } }
              ]}
            ]
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "styles": [
    { "selectors": ["hero"], "style": { "padding-top": "40px", "…": "…" } }
  ],
  "assets": [],
  "symbols": [],
  "dataSources": []
}

A structured project: pages, a component tree, style rules keyed by selector, assets and configuration. HTML and CSS are generated from it, not stored as it.

The two models serve different purposes and should not be treated as interchangeable formats. There is no converter that turns a content string into a component tree, because the tree carries decisions the string never recorded.

Migration

Moving From TinyMCE to GrapesJS

How hard this is depends almost entirely on what TinyMCE is currently doing in your product. Start by finding out.

  1. 1
    Assess

    Audit what TinyMCE actually does today

    List every place the editor appears, every plugin enabled, and every piece of custom HTML your content depends on.

  2. 2
    Assess

    Separate content from layout

    Some of what your users type is content. Some of it is layout they were forced to express as content. Only the second kind needs a new home.

  3. 3
    Assess

    Decide which layers you are moving

    Moving the page layer to GrapesJS does not require moving the content layer off TinyMCE. Decide this before writing code.

  4. 4
    Model

    Model your content types as components

    Each repeated shape in your existing content becomes a GrapesJS component type with its own traits.

  5. 5
    Model

    Build the block palette

    The GrapesJS core ships no blocks. Whatever your users should be able to drag in, you define — or install.

  6. 6
    Model

    Map your styling

    Decide what the Style Manager exposes and what stays locked to your design system, then wire your CSS framework in.

  7. 7
    Move

    Choose the rich-text layer

    Keep the built-in GrapesJS RTE if your copy is short. Integrate TinyMCE if your users need the editor they already know.

  8. 8
    Move

    Move the content

    Existing markup can be imported into a GrapesJS canvas, but mapping it onto your component types is deliberate work, not a script.

  9. 9
    Move

    Verify the output

    Compare published pages against the originals across breakpoints before switching anyone over.

Simpler migration

If your TinyMCE usage is close to stock, most of the work is modelling rather than conversion.

  • Basic text
  • Headings
  • Lists
  • Links
  • Simple media
  • Basic formatting

More complex migration

Each of these represents behaviour that lives outside the content string and has to be rebuilt or kept.

  • Custom plugins
  • Custom HTML
  • Custom content structures
  • Collaboration
  • Comments
  • Mentions
  • Revision workflows
  • Custom rendering
  • Complex integrations

A TinyMCE → GrapesJS migration may be an architectural migration from content editing to visual page editing rather than a simple editor replacement. Plan it as the former and the second half will not surprise you.

Before you migrate anything

You May Not Need to Replace TinyMCE

Three outcomes, and only one of them involves removing anything.

Keep TinyMCE

Content

When rich-text editing is the main requirement and your templates already handle layout. Nothing on this page argues for changing a setup that fits.

Add GrapesJS

Layout

When users have started asking for page composition your templates cannot express. GrapesJS goes alongside TinyMCE, on a different screen.

Combine both

Visual content builder

When users need visual page building and advanced rich-text editing in the same place. TinyMCE becomes the rich-text layer inside the GrapesJS canvas.

Decide

Which Editor Should You Choose?

Find the row closest to what you are building.

Use caseRecommended starting point
Blog editorTinyMCE
Article editorTinyMCE
Documentation editorTinyMCE
CMS rich-text fieldTinyMCE
Content authoringTinyMCE
Landing page builderGrapesJSread more
Website builderGrapesJSread more
SaaS page builderGrapesJSread more
HTML/CSS visual editorGrapesJSread more
Embeddable page builderGrapesJSread more
White-label visual editorGrapesJSread more
Visual CMSGrapesJSread more
Rich text inside a page builderGrapesJS + TinyMCEread more

These recommendations describe primary use cases, not hard technical limitations. Plenty of products run against the grain of this table for good reasons.

One question, three answers

What are your users editing?

Text

TinyMCE

The content is the product. Layout comes from your templates.

TinyMCE docs

Pages

GrapesJS

The layout is the product. Users compose, style and preview it.

Try the editor

Both

GrapesJS + TinyMCE

Users compose pages and write inside them, and neither can feel secondary.

See the integration
Integration

Integrate GrapesJS Into Your Stack

GrapesJS renders into a DOM element and edits an iframe canvas, so it drops into an application built with any of these. It does not share their component models — a GrapesJS component is the editor's own model object, not a React or Vue component — and the guides below cover the wiring that difference implies.

Extensibility

Extend Your Editor

Both editors are extensible, and both have real ecosystems. They extend in different directions, which is the same distinction again from a developer's seat.

TinyMCE extends the content layer

  • A documented plugin API and a long list of bundled plugins
  • A premium plugin line covering collaboration, comments, mentions and more
  • A large configuration surface — toolbars, menus, formats, content styles
  • Official React, Vue and Angular components maintained by Tiny

GrapesJS extends the page layer

  • Plugins that register anything below in one call
  • Blocks — what your users can drag onto the canvas
  • Components — the editable model behind the markup
  • Component types with their own view and behaviour
  • Traits — the per-component settings panel
  • Commands — everything the editor can be told to do
  • Style Manager sectors and properties
  • Storage adapters for where projects are saved
From the marketplace

GJS.Market plugins for the layers you don't want to build

Ready-to-use plugins for common GrapesJS requirements. Every listing here is a real product on this marketplace.

Beyond the comparison

What Can You Build With GrapesJS?

Services

Need a Custom GrapesJS Integration?

Building a production editor often requires more than installing a package. Get help with GrapesJS architecture, custom plugins, migrations, integrations and editor customization.

  • Editor architecture and technical planning
  • Rich-text integration, including TinyMCE
  • Custom plugins and component types
  • Block palettes and design-system mapping
  • Migration from an existing editor
  • Storage adapters and project persistence
  • White-labelling and UI customization
  • Frontend integration and publishing pipeline

Scope, timeline and price are agreed per project after we have seen what you already have — there is no fixed package here, and no estimate before that conversation.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between GrapesJS and TinyMCE?

TinyMCE is a rich-text editor: it owns what happens inside a block of content — formatting, lists, tables, links, media. GrapesJS is a visual editor and page-building framework: it owns the page itself — the component tree, the layout, the styles and the breakpoints. They operate on different objects, which is why they can be used together.

Is TinyMCE a page builder?

Not primarily. TinyMCE is highly customizable and its plugin API is thorough, but a page builder needs a visual canvas, a component model, layout tools, a style editor, reusable blocks, responsive editing and project structure. Those would be yours to build on top of TinyMCE.

Is GrapesJS a rich-text editor?

GrapesJS includes one. Its built-in rich-text editor ships six default toolbar actions — bold, italic, underline, strikethrough, link and wrap — which is enough for headlines, buttons and short copy. It is also designed to be replaced, which is how TinyMCE gets in.

Can TinyMCE build websites?

TinyMCE produces the content that goes into pages; it is not designed to compose the pages themselves. Teams do build page-like experiences on it, but the layout layer is custom work rather than something the editor provides.

Can GrapesJS edit rich text?

Yes. Text components are editable in place with the built-in toolbar, and the rich-text layer is a replaceable module — so if the default six actions are not enough, you swap in a fuller editor rather than losing rich text.

Can I use TinyMCE inside GrapesJS?

Yes. GrapesJS exposes its rich-text editing as a module that an integration can replace, and TinyMCE is one of the editors people replace it with. GJS.Market sells a ready-made integration, the TinyMCE 8 Inline Text Editor, for $69.

How do I integrate TinyMCE with GrapesJS?

You register a plugin that replaces the editor's rich-text module, mount TinyMCE against the selected element, and make sure the toolbar renders somewhere it is not clipped by the canvas iframe. The ready-made integration handles the last part — including rendering the toolbar in the parent document for GrapesJS Studio — and adds separate block and inline toolbars.

Which is better for a CMS?

It depends on which layer your editors are complaining about. For article and documentation workflows where layout comes from templates, TinyMCE. For landing pages and marketing pages where layout is part of the job, GrapesJS. Many CMS products eventually run both, on different screens.

Which is better for a blog?

TinyMCE. A blog editor is a content editor: the layout is fixed by the theme and what varies is the writing. Adding a page builder to a blog usually adds a decision your authors did not want to make.

Which is better for a SaaS page builder?

GrapesJS. When your customers' job is to build pages, the editor is the product, and GrapesJS is a framework for exactly that — canvas, components, styles, storage and an extensible UI you can white-label.

Can TinyMCE replace GrapesJS?

For a genuine page builder, not without building the page layer yourself. TinyMCE is extensible enough that it is technically possible; it is simply a much larger job than it looks, because the missing pieces are the canvas, the component model, the style editor and the project structure.

Can GrapesJS replace TinyMCE?

Sometimes. For short marketing copy the built-in rich-text editor is enough and most GrapesJS builders never add anything. For long-form content, tables, structured formatting or review workflows, integrate a fuller rich-text editor instead.

Can GrapesJS and TinyMCE work together?

Yes, and that combination is the point of this page. GrapesJS provides the visual canvas and preserves the page structure; TinyMCE takes over when a user starts editing text inside a component. Your application stores the project data and publishes the result.

Which editor is better for a landing page builder?

GrapesJS. Landing pages are layout-first: sections, spacing, breakpoints and reusable blocks. If your marketing team also writes long copy inside those pages, adding TinyMCE as the rich-text layer covers the other half.

Does GrapesJS support TypeScript?

Yes. The grapesjs package ships its own type definitions at dist/index.d.ts. Note that recent typings require a reasonably modern TypeScript to parse.

Does TinyMCE support TypeScript?

Yes. The tinymce package ships type definitions at tinymce.d.ts, and Tiny's official React, Vue and Angular components are typed as well.

Can GrapesJS be white-labeled?

Yes. Panels, buttons, commands, the Style Manager's sectors and the editor's CSS are all replaceable, and nothing in the core requires the GrapesJS name to appear in your product.

Can I migrate from TinyMCE to GrapesJS?

Yes, but plan it as an architectural migration rather than an editor swap. TinyMCE returns a content string and GrapesJS works with a project document, so the work is in modelling your content types as components — not in running a converter, because there isn't one.

Can GJS.Market help with GrapesJS integration?

Yes. GJS.Market sells ready-made GrapesJS plugins — including the TinyMCE 8 rich-text integration — and offers custom work on editor architecture, plugins, migrations and white-labelling.
Where to go next

Build the Editing Experience Your Product Needs

TinyMCE is a strong choice when your product revolves around rich-text and content authoring. GrapesJS is a strong choice when your users need to visually build pages, layouts and components. And when your product needs both, combine GrapesJS with TinyMCE to create a visual editor with a powerful rich-text experience.

Free

Try GrapesJS

A real editor is running further up this page. Drag something in and see whether the model fits your product.

Open the editor
$69

Add TinyMCE to GrapesJS

The ready-made TinyMCE 8 integration — block and inline toolbars, Studio support, source included.

Get the plugin
Marketplace

Explore plugins

Blocks, components, storage adapters and rich-text integrations for the layers you would rather not build.

Browse plugins
Services

Talk to an expert

Architecture, custom plugins, migrations and white-labelling, scoped against what you already have.

Start a conversation

Whichever way this page pointed you, the useful outcome is the same: you now know which layer of your product the editor belongs to, and you can stop comparing tools that were never solving the same problem.

Content editor

TinyMCE

Owns what happens inside a block of text: formatting, structure, media, and the writing experience around them.

  • Rich text
  • Articles
  • CMS content
  • Documentation
Visual editor

GrapesJS

Owns the page itself: the component tree, the layout, the styles, the breakpoints and the reusable pieces.

  • Pages
  • Layouts
  • Components
  • Styles
  • Templates
Visual content builder

GrapesJS + TinyMCE

GrapesJS composes the page; TinyMCE takes over the moment a user starts editing the text inside one of its components.

  • GrapesJS → the page
  • TinyMCE → the rich text